If you didn't know, it is racist to use black emojis, gifs, and memes. Apparently, every image of a black person must be the most positive image, because every individual black person represents the whole race . Anything that shows a black person in a less than ingratiating light (i.e. being human) must be disregarded. According to this video, using black emojis is cultural appropriation. Apparently, black people have a copyright on brown skin, so how dare you post that brown thumbs up emoji! To be clear, it is cultural appropriation whenever non-blacks use an element of black culture, but it is not when black people "borrow" various cultures' music, clothes, and sacred traditions in hiphop. The same person screaming cultural appropriation will bump Wu-Tang with a tattoo of Chinese characters on their neck while cooking Mexican food with a Redskins jersey on.

I agree with the premise of the video, which is, one should not discriminate based on sexual orientation. Although, I disagree with Black Lives Matter's Deray Mckesson's political views. I don't think that he should be dissed because he's gay. What I don't like is the "fighting for our freedom" and the overall BLM victimology, and it reeks from this video.

It is truly mind-numbing and mind-blowing how the progressive left celebrates and defends terrorists, but wants historic statues removed because of the historical figure's 19th century views. Check out this video.

The way Tariq Nasheed invents racial narratives out of thin air is an art. He should definitely go into fiction writing. All of a sudden, former MTV reporter Tabitha Soren is a white supremacist because she wasn't a fan of Tupac's music, was concerned about his reputation, and was afraid that his crew was strapped with guns? Listen to the artful way Tariq puts everything she says through a racial filter. My question is this, if Tabitha Soren is a white supremacist because she was concerned about the rape charges put against him, what does that make the black woman who levied the charges in the first place? She praised him several times throughout the video, but, as with Tariq, he ignores everything that doesn't fit the narrative.

Today, racism seems to be everywhere, at least according to SJWs. We're told we live in a system of white supremacy. When they are not sipping on a Starbucks latte, eating a burrito bowl, or texting on their IPhone — we're told they are modern day slaves. The reason why racism seems to be at epidemic proportions today is because the definition has changed. At one time, racism was defined as 'the superiority and inferiority of races.' This definition could apply to anyone, however, in the past racism came mainly from whites to non-whites during the era of real white supremacy. Traditional examples of racism were slavery, lynchings, Jim Crow, racial epithets, eugenics, etc. Today, those things, for the most part, are gone. Since the most overt forms of racism have vanished, the definition of racism had to undergo a re-tooling. Today, the social justice re-definition of racism is "prejudice plus power" and the only people with power are whites. The argumen

White privilege is a term that describes societal advantages that benefit white people not commonly experienced by non-whites under the same circumstances. For example, whites are more likely to be hired, less likely to be stopped by police, and more likely to get a loan than blacks. White privilege is often used to silence dissent by claiming a white person's opinion is less valid because they benefit from white privilege. The problem with white privilege theory is the problem with racism in general — it applies averages to individuals, and that's not how averages work. For instance, it would be racist to assume a black person is underprivileged because statistically he/she is more likely to be poor. The same logic follows when assuming one is privileged because of their race. According to intersectionality theory, people have multiple social identities that intersect or overlap. The problem of white privilege theory is that it uses an 'all things being equal' appr